Hunter v. Lumpkin
| David Alexander Hunter |
| Bobby Lumpkin |
| 4:2021cv00437 |
| February 9, 2021 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Alfred H Bennett |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Nathan Tadema on behalf of Bobby Lumpkin, filed. (Tadema, Nathan) |
| Filing 8 CONSENT to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge by David Alexander Hunter, filed. (Attachments: #1 Letter)(jtabares, 1) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Payment of Filing Fee by David Alexander Hunter, filed. (jtabares, 1) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Payment of Filing Fee by David Alexander Hunter, filed. (JosephWells, 4) |
Filing 5
ORDER TO ANSWER. Answer due for Bobby Lumpkin 4/16/2021 (Signed by Judge Alfred H Bennett) Parties notified.(gkelner, 4)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (mmapps, 4) |
| Filing 3 Case transferred in from Texas Eastern. Case Number 5:21-cv-00005; certified copy of transfer order, certified docket sheet, and transfer letter received |
| Interdistrict transfer to the Southern District of Texas- Houston Division. (Held for 20 days with no objections to transfer per Local Rule 83) (slo, ) |
Filing 2
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. It is accordingly ORDERED that this petition for writ of habeas corpus is TRANSFERRED to the Houston Division of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas. (Held for 20 days pursuant to Local Rule 83) Signed by Magistrate Judge Caroline Craven on 1/19/2021. (slo, )
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by David Alexander Hunter. (Attachments: #1 cover letter, #2 Envelope(s))(lfs, ) |
STANDING ORDER REFERRING HABEAS CASE to Magistrate Judge Caroline Craven for all pretrial matters. Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 01/15/21. (lfs, )
|
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (lfs, ) |
| Prose Guidelines, including information regarding informing court of changes of address, sent to Plaintiff per Magistrate Judge Craven. (lfs, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hunter v. Lumpkin | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: David Alexander Hunter | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin | |
| Represented By: | Edward Larry Marshall |
| Represented By: | Nathan Tadema |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.