Patterson v. TEVA USA et al
Perry Patterson |
North America and TEVA USA |
4:2021cv00531 |
February 11, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Ewing Werlein |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Letter from Perry Patterson, filed. (scastillo, 1) |
Filing 7 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Perry Patterson, filed. (ChristopherSarrat, 4) |
Filing 6 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Perry Patterson, filed. Motion Docket Date 4/26/2021. (ChristopherSarrat, 4) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/5/2021: #1 Exhibit) (ChristopherSarrat, 4). |
Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Perry Patterson. Related document: #1 Complaint filed by Perry Patterson.(ChristopherSarrat, 4) |
Filing 4 CLERKS NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING as to Perry Patterson. Parties notified Notice of Compliance due by 4/23/2021, filed. (Attachments: #1 Appendix, #2 Appendix) (bgoolsby, 4) |
Filing 3 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (bgoolsby, 4) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel by Perry Patterson, filed. Motion Docket Date 3/4/2021. (bgoolsby, 4) |
Filing 1 Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against North America, TEVA USA (Filing fee $ 402) filed by Perry Patterson.(bgoolsby, 4) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.