Wild v. OnDuty Pest Control, L.L.C.
| Alexander Lewis Wild |
| OnDuty Pest Control, L.L.C. |
| 4:2021cv00535 |
| February 18, 2021 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Charles Eskridge |
| Sam S Sheldon |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand by OnDuty Pest Control, L.L.C., filed.(Prather, Michael) |
Filing 8
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Sam S Sheldon. The parties are ordered to advise within twenty days of the entry of this order whether they will consent to the jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge Sheldon for all purposes in this case pursuant to 28 USC 636(c).(Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) Parties notified.(jengonzalez, 4)
|
|
Filing 7
SCHEDULING and DOCKET CONTROL ORDER. Amended Pleadings due by 07/08/2021. Joinder of Parties due by 06/08/2021. Plaintiff Expert Report due by 01/04/2022. Deft Expert Report due by 02/03/2022. Discovery due by 03/22/2022. Mediation due by 06/07/2022. Dispositive Motion Filing due by 04/21/2022. Non-Dispositive Motion Filing due by 04/21/2022. Joint Pretrial Order due by 07/07/2022. Docket Call set for 08/15/2022 at 9:30 AM before Judge Charles Eskridge. (Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) Parties notified. (jengonzalezadi) (Entered: 03/05/2021)
|
| Filing 6 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to OnDuty Pest Control, L.L.C. served on 3/3/2021, answer due 3/24/2021, filed.(Rothman, Joel) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 5/6/2021 at 10:00 AM in by video before Magistrate Judge Sam S Sheldon. (Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) Parties notified.(jengonzalezadi, 4)
|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to OnDuty Pest Control, L.L.C.. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(JosephWells, 4) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Alexander Lewis Wild, filed.(Rothman, Joel) |
| Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to OnDuty Pest Control, L.L.C., filed.(Rothman, Joel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against OnDuty Pest Control, L.L.C. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0541-25980456) filed by Alexander Lewis Wild. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Registration, #2 Exhibit 2 - Infringement, #3 Exhibit 3 - Demand Letters, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Form AO-121)(Rothman, Joel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Wild v. OnDuty Pest Control, L.L.C. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Alexander Lewis Wild | |
| Represented By: | Joel Benjamin Rothman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: OnDuty Pest Control, L.L.C. | |
| Represented By: | Michael John Prather |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
