GEICO Advantage Insurance Company v. United States Air Force et al
GEICO Advantage Insurance Company |
Ramon Reyes and United States Air Force |
4:2021cv00561 |
February 22, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Charles Eskridge |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 SCHEDULING and DOCKET CONTROL ORDER. Amended Pleadings due by 07/08/2021. Joinder of Parties due by 06/08/2021. Plaintiff Expert Report due by 01/04/2022. Deft Expert Report due by 02/03/2022. Discovery due by 03/22/2022. Mediation due by 06/07/2022. Dispositive Motion Filing due by 04/21/2022. Non-Dispositive Motion Filing due by 04/21/2022. Joint Pretrial Order due by 07/07/2022. Docket Call set for 08/15/2022 at 9:30 AM before Judge Charles Eskridge. (Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) Parties notified. (jengonzalezadi) (Entered: 03/05/2021) |
Filing 2 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 5/6/2021 at 09:45 AM in by video before Magistrate Judge Sam S Sheldon. (Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) Parties notified.(jengonzalezadi, 4) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Plaintiffs (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0541-25996152) filed by GEICO Advantage Insurance Company.(Halpin, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.