Bradford v. Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC
Plaintiff: Radley Bradford
Defendant: Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC and Goldman Sachs Bank USA
Case Number: 4:2021cv00586
Filed: February 24, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Kenneth M Hoyt
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 9, 2021 Filing 11 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Goldman Sachs Bank USA served on 4/9/2021, answer due 6/8/2021, filed.(Metroff, Victor)
April 9, 2021 Filing 10 Summons Issued as to Goldman Sachs Bank USA. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(JacquelineMata, 4)
April 8, 2021 Filing 9 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Goldman Sachs Bank USA, filed.(Metroff, Victor)
April 8, 2021 Filing 8 First AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Goldman Sachs Bank USA filed by Radley Bradford. Related document: #1 Complaint filed by Radley Bradford.(Metroff, Victor)
March 11, 2021 Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Radley Bradford, filed.(Badwan, Mohammed)
February 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference by Telephone and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Counsel who filed or removed the action is responsible for placing the conference call and insuring that all parties are on the line. The call shall be placed to (713)250-5613. Telephone Conference set for 6/14/2021 at 09:30 AM by telephone before Judge Kenneth M Hoyt (Signed by Judge Kenneth M Hoyt) Parties notified.(ClaudiaGutierrezadi, 4)
February 25, 2021 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed. (JacquelineMata, 4)
February 24, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Mohammed O. Badwan on behalf of Radley Bradford, filed. (Badwan, Mohammed)
February 24, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Victor T. Metroff on behalf of Radley Bradford, filed. (Metroff, Victor)
February 24, 2021 Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC, filed.(Metroff, Victor)
February 24, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0541-26009892) filed by Radley Bradford. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Metroff, Victor)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bradford v. Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Radley Bradford
Represented By: Mohammed Omar Badwan
Represented By: Victor Thomas Metroff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Goldman Sachs Bank USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?