Trevino v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
| Rodolfo Trevino |
| C R Bard Inc and Bard Peripheral Vacsular, Inc. |
| 4:2021cv00636 |
| February 26, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Sim Lake |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER - Granting #12 Joint MOTION to Stay Temporary and Incorporated Memorandum of Law. All proceedings, including discovery and all pretrial deadlines, are hereby STAYED through July 16, 2021 in order to permit the parties to finalize settlement of this case...*** Initial Conference set 3/19/21 at 2:00 pm is CANCELLED...*** STAY flag set. (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified.(sanderson, 4)
|
| Filing 12 Joint MOTION to Stay Temporary and Incorporated Memorandum of Law by Bard Peripheral Vacsular, Inc., C R Bard Inc, filed. Motion Docket Date 4/5/2021. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Agnew, Kristin) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER - Granting #10 Unopposed MOTION for Richard North, Jr. to Withdraw as Attorney Unopposed MOTION to Substitute Attorney Paul B. Kerlin in place of Richard North, Jr. for Bard Peripheral Vacsular, Inc., C R Bard Inc...*** Attorney Richard B North, Jr terminated. (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified.(sanderson, 4)
|
| Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION for Richard North, Jr. to Withdraw as Attorney( Motion Docket Date 4/2/2021.), Unopposed MOTION to Substitute Attorney Paul B. Kerlin in place of Richard North, Jr. by Bard Peripheral Vacsular, Inc., C R Bard Inc, filed. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Kerlin, Paul) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Kristin H. Agnew on behalf of Bard Peripheral Vacsular, Inc., C R Bard Inc, filed. (Agnew, Kristin) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Paul B. Kerlin on behalf of Bard Peripheral Vacsular, Inc., C R Bard Inc, filed. (Kerlin, Paul) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Steven Scott Schulte on behalf of Rodolfo Trevino, filed. (Schulte, Steven) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 3/19/2021 at 02:00 PM in by telephone before Judge Sim Lake. (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified.(sanderson, 4)
|
| Filing 5 Case electronically transferred in from Arizona. Case Number 2:18-cv-03309. (ltien, 4) |
| Remark: Transferring Case to the Southern District of Texas via electronic transfer. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
|
Filing 4
AMENDED SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (FIFTH). See Order for Complete Details. Signed by Senior Judge David G Campbell on 2/11/2021. (MAP)
|
|
Filing 3
*AMENDED By Doc. #4 *SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER (FIFTH). See Order for Complete Details. Signed by Senior Judge David G Campbell on 2/9/2021. (MAP) *Modified on 2/19/2021 (MAP).
|
| Filing 2 This case has been assigned to the Honorable David G. Campbell, with member case number: CV-18-3309-PHX-DGC. This case is included in MDL-2641. All future pleadings or documents should be filed in the Lead Case: 2:15-md-2641-DGC. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-16079041 filed by Rodolfo Trevino. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MAP) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
