Walker v. Cardinal Logistics Management Corporation et al
John Walker |
Cardinal Logistics Management Corporation and Walter Crawford |
4:2021cv00713 |
March 4, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Lynn N Hughes |
Motor Vehicle |
23 U.S.C. ยง 134 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Final DISMISSAL. Having been advised that Walker no longer wishes to pursue his claims against the defendants, this case is dismissed without prejudice #4 . Case terminated on 3/29/2021. (Signed by Judge Lynn N Hughes) Parties notified. (ghassan, 4) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss without Prejudice by John Walker, filed. Motion Docket Date 4/16/2021. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(de la Garza, Mario) |
Filing 3 ORDER FOR CONFERENCE. Initial Conference set for 5/10/2021 at 03:30 PM in Room 11122 before Judge Lynn N Hughes (Signed by Judge Lynn N Hughes) Parties notified.(MelissaMorganadi, 4) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Cardinal Logistics Management Corporation. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(MelissaMorgan, 4) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0541-26061757) filed by John Walker. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(de la Garza, Mario) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.