Munoz v. The Kroger Co.
| Crystal Munoz |
| The Kroger Co. |
| 4:2021cv00824 |
| March 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Gray H Miller |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER Granting #13 Agreed MOTION for Protective Order (Signed by Judge Gray H Miller) Parties notified.(jguajardo, 4)
|
| Filing 13 Agreed MOTION for Protective Order by The Kroger Co., filed. Motion Docket Date 5/24/2021. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Ly, Valerie) |
| Filing 12 INITIAL DISCLOSURES by Jonathan E. Bleyer, Abraham Carreon, Sam K. Mukerji, Crystal Munoz, filed.(Mukerji, Sambar) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Serving Initial Disclosures by The Kroger Co., filed. (Ly, Valerie) |
|
Filing 10
SCHEDULING ORDER - ETT: 2-3 Days. Jury. Joinder of Parties due by 5/7/2021. Amended Pleadings due by 5/14/2021. Pltf Expert Report due by 9/15/2021. Deft Expert Report due by 11/15/2021. Discovery due by 12/31/2021. Dispositive Motion Filing due by 1/4/2022. Mediation due by 2/7/2022. Joint Pretrial Order due by 3/4/2022. Objections due by 3/21/2022. Docket Call set for 4/4/2022 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 9D before Judge Gray H Miller. (Signed by Judge Gray H Miller) Parties notified. (aarcher, 4)
|
| Filing 9 Agreed JOINT DISCOVERY/CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN by The Kroger Co., filed.(Ly, Valerie) |
| Filing 8 DESIGNATION of Abraham Carreon as attorney in charge of Crystal Munoz, filed.(Mukerji, Sambar) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Crystal Munoz, filed.(Mukerji, Sambar) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by The Kroger Co., filed.(Ly, Valerie) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Scheduling Order Deadline date 4/30/2021(Signed by Judge Gray H Miller) Parties notified.(rkonieczny, 4)
|
| Filing 4 STATEMENT Concerning Removal by The Kroger Co., filed.(Ly, Valerie) |
|
Filing 3
Order in Removed Cases. Statement due within ten days. (Signed by Judge Gray H Miller) Parties notified.(ShadiaNashadi, 4)
|
| Filing 2 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by The Kroger Co., filed.(Ly, Valerie) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 125th Harris County Judicial District, case number 2021-07528 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0541-26102821) filed by The Kroger Co.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit)(Ly, Valerie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Munoz v. The Kroger Co. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The Kroger Co. | |
| Represented By: | Valerie Lu Ly |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Crystal Munoz | |
| Represented By: | Sambar Kumar Mukerji |
| Represented By: | Lauren Gian Carlo Hamor |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
