Mosele et al v. Mathis et al
| Thomas J Mosele and Elizabeth S Mosele |
| Kenneth B Mathis and The State Of Texas |
| 4:2021cv01100 |
| April 5, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Lynn N Hughes |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
RESPONSE to #11 MOTION to Dismiss #6 Amended Complaint/Counterclaim/Crossclaim etc. filed by Elizabeth S Mosele, Thomas J Mosele. (Attachments: #1 exhibit c, #2 exhibit d, #3 exhibit e, #4 exhibit f)(ckrus, 4) Modified on 6/2/2021 (sguevara, 4).
|
|
Filing 16
ORDER on Seal. Appendix C to Mathis's motion to dismiss is sealed #14 . (Signed by Judge Lynn N Hughes) Parties notified. (ghassan, 4)
|
|
Filing 15
OBJECTIONS, RESPONSE, and Supplemental Evidence Concerning Mathis' to #8 MOTION to Dismiss #1 Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6), filed by Elizabeth S Mosele, Thomas J Mosele. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit)(mmapps, 4)
|
|
Filing 14
SEALED MOTION by Kenneth B Mathis, filed. (Attachments: #1 Appendix C, #2 Proposed Order) (McCracken, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 13
MOTION to Dismiss #6 Amended Complaint/Counterclaim/Crossclaim etc. by Kenneth B Mathis, filed. Motion Docket Date 6/7/2021. (Attachments: #1 Appendix A, #2 Appendix B, #3 Proposed Order)(McCracken, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 12
NOTICE AMENDED CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re: #11 MOTION to Dismiss 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) by The State Of Texas, filed. (Ryman, Shannon)
|
|
Filing 11
MOTION to Dismiss 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) by The State Of Texas, filed. Motion Docket Date 6/1/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Proposed Order)(Ryman, Shannon)
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE OF SERVICE of Mandatory Initial Discovery Responses by Kenneth B Mathis, filed. (McCracken, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 9
Amended Certificate of Service Regarding Kenneth B. Mathis, MD's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) by Kenneth B Mathis, filed.(McCracken, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION to Dismiss #1 Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) by Kenneth B Mathis, filed. Motion Docket Date 5/19/2021. (McCracken, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 7
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of #6 Amended Complaint/Counterclaim/Crossclaim etc. by Thomas J Mosele, filed.(ChristopherSarrat, 4)
|
|
Filing 6
First AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Thomas J Mosele. Related document: #1 Complaint filed by Elizabeth S Mosele, Kenneth B Mathis.(ChristopherSarrat, 4) (Main Document 6 replaced on 4/26/2021) (ckrus, 4).
|
|
Filing 5
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Thomas J Mosele, filed.(ShoshanaArnow, 4)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER Denying Recusal terminating #3 . (Signed by Judge Lynn N Hughes) Parties notified. (ghassan, 4)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER FOR CONFERENCE. Initial Conference set for 7/6/2021 at 10:00 AM in Room 11122 before Judge Lynn N Hughes (Signed by Judge Lynn N Hughes) Parties notified.(jdavadi, 4)
|
|
Filing Filing fee: $402.00 re: #1 Complaint, receipt number HOU101405, filed. (jdav, 4)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION to reconsider reassignment by Thomas J Mosele, filed. Motion Docket Date 4/26/2021. (jdav, 4)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Kenneth B Mathis, The State Of Texas filed by Kenneth B Mathis, Elizabeth S Mosele.(jdav, 4)
|
|
Summons Issued as to All Defendants. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff in person, filed.(jdav, 4)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
