Washington v. Smith et al
Plaintiff: Jalen Washington
Defendant: Great Dane, LLC, Johnathan Dion Smith and DG Logistics, LLC
Case Number: 4:2021cv01143
Filed: April 7, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Andrew S Hanen
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting #5 Motion to Substitute Attorney Attorney Ron Thomas Capehart terminated. attorney Mike Bassett is added..(Signed by Judge Andrew S Hanen) Parties notified.(jdav, 4)
May 20, 2021 Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION to Substitute Attorney Mike H. Bassett in place of Ron T. Capehart by DG Logistics, LLC, Johnathan Dion Smith, filed. Motion Docket Date 6/10/2021. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Order Granting Defendants, DG Logistics LLC and Johnathan Dion Smith's, Unopposed Motion to Withdraw and Substitute Counsel of Record)(Bassett, Michael)
April 23, 2021 Filing 4 Amended CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by DG Logistics, LLC, Johnathan Dion Smith, filed.(Bassett, Michael)
April 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 11/9/2021 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 704 before Magistrate Judge Frances H Stacy. (Signed by Judge Andrew S Hanen) Parties notified.(RubenCastroadi, 4)
April 7, 2021 Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by DG Logistics, LLC, Johnathan Dion Smith identifying DG Transportation, Inc. as Corporate Parent, filed.(Capehart, Ron)
April 7, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 215th Judicial District, case number 202111148 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0541-26242389) filed by DG Logistics, LLC, Johnathan Dion Smith. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Index of State Court Documents, #2 Exhibit Docket Sheet, #3 Exhibit State Court Documents, #4 Exhibit List of Parties CV-81(c)(1), #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Supplement Civil Cover Sheet Supplement)(Capehart, Ron)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Washington v. Smith et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Great Dane, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Johnathan Dion Smith
Represented By: Ron Thomas Capehart
Represented By: Michael H Bassett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DG Logistics, LLC
Represented By: Ron Thomas Capehart
Represented By: Michael H Bassett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jalen Washington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?