Howard v. City Of Houston et al
Aundre Howard |
Nadeem Aslam, Thomas Serrano, City Of Houston, Art Acevedo and Lucas L. Vieira |
4:2021cv01179 |
April 11, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Gray H Miller |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Scheduling Order Deadline date 9/17/2021 (Signed by Judge Gray H Miller) Parties notified.(RubenCastroadi, 4) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Art Acevedo, Nadeem Aslam, City Of Houston, Thomas Serrano, Lucas L. Vieira. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons) (DesireeSillas, 4). |
Summons Not Issued as to St. Attlebury due to these deficiencies: Party named on summons is not a named defendant on the case. Attorney or Plaintiff notified of deficiencies by NEF, filed.(DesireeSillas, 4) |
Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to All Defendants, filed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit)(Kallinen, Randall) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0541-26258335) filed by Aundre Howard. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kallinen, Randall) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.