Bustos v. Rodriguez et al
| Nicolas Bustos |
| Board of Pardons & Paroles and Judge Raul Rodriguez |
| 4:2021cv01305 |
| April 19, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| David Hittner |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 FINAL JUDGMENT. Case terminated on June 15, 2021(Signed by Judge David Hittner) Parties notified.(ealexander, 4) |
Filing 4
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL granting #2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. The Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed with prejudice for failing to state a claim for which relief may be granted. Copies sent by email per directions in the order. Email sent to Manager of Three Strikes List. (Signed by Judge David Hittner) Parties notified.(ealexander, 4)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (ChristopherSarrat, 4) |
| Filing 2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Nicolas Bustos, filed. Motion Docket Date 5/10/2021. (ChristopherSarrat, 4) |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402) filed by Nicolas Bustos.(ChristopherSarrat, 4) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/20/2021: #1 Envelope) (ChristopherSarrat, 4). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
