Fitzgerald v. Apache Corporation
Plaintiff: Shelly Nash Fitzgerald
Defendant: Apache Corporation
Case Number: 4:2021cv01306
Filed: April 20, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Lee H Rosenthal
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 19 MOTION to Dismiss by Apache Corporation, filed. Motion Docket Date 7/2/2021. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Merrill, William)
June 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 18 NOTICE of Change of Address by Sharp Law, LLP, counsel for Shelly Nash Fitzgerald, filed. (Sharp, Rex)
May 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 17 Joint Stipulation Order to Extend Time to Answer Class Action Complaint RE: #11 Proposed Order ( Deft's. Answer due by 6/23/2021 )(Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(jguajardo, 4)
May 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Apache Corporation identifying APA Corporation as Corporate Parent, filed.(Merrill, William)
May 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER granting #14 Motion for Max Straus to Appear Pro Hac Vice.(Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(gkelner, 4)
May 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MOTION for Max Isaac Straus to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Apache Corporation, filed. Motion Docket Date 6/2/2021. (Merrill, William)
May 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Abigail C. Noebels on behalf of Apache Corporation, filed. (Merrill, William)
May 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by William R.H. Merrill on behalf of Apache Corporation, filed. (Merrill, William)
May 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Unopposed PROPOSED ORDER Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Extend Time to Answer Class Action Complaint, filed.(Merrill, William)
May 7, 2021 Opinion or Order ***Set/Reset Hearings: Initial Conference set for 7/30/2021 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 11B before Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal. Date reset to original setting due to error in docketing. (leddins, 4)
May 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to Apache Corporation served on 4/30/2021, answer due 5/21/2021, filed.(Sharp, Rex)
May 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ***FILED IN ERROR***ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 7/13/2021 at 09:45 AM in by video before Magistrate Judge Sam S Sheldon. (Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(jengonzalezadi, 4) Modified on 5/6/2021 (jengonzalez, 4).
May 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Corrective Entry: 9 Order for Initial Conference - FORM, was recorded on the wrong docket, filed. (jengonzalez, 4)
May 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Initial Conference set for 7/13/2021 at 09:45 AM in by video before Magistrate Judge Sam S Sheldon. is terminated. Hearing inadvertently set. (jengonzalez, 4)
May 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER granting #5 Motion for William Gregory Wright to Appear Pro Hac Vice.(Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(gkelner, 4)
May 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER granting #6 Motion for Scott Goodger to Appear Pro Hac Vice.(Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(gkelner, 4)
May 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MOTION for Scott B. Goodger to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Shelly Nash Fitzgerald, filed. Motion Docket Date 5/24/2021. (Sharp, Rex)
May 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MOTION for William Gregory Wright to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Shelly Nash Fitzgerald, filed. Motion Docket Date 5/24/2021. (Sharp, Rex)
April 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER Scheduling Rule 16 Conference With the Court and Setting Out the Requirements for Initial Pretrial Work. Initial Conference set for 7/30/2021 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 11B before Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal. (Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) (Attachments: #1 Attachments) Parties notified.(DesireeSillasadi, 4)
April 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Apache Corporation. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(ChristopherSarrat, 4)
April 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Apache Corporation, filed.(Sharp, Rex)
April 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Apache Corporation (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0541-26307412) filed by Shelly Nash Fitzgerald. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-Lease, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sharp, Rex)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fitzgerald v. Apache Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shelly Nash Fitzgerald
Represented By: Rex A Sharp
Represented By: Scott B Goodger
Represented By: Allison Baker Waters
Represented By: William Gregory Wright
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Apache Corporation
Represented By: William RH Merrill
Represented By: Max Isaac Straus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?