Patterson v. Gonzalez et al
Drew Patterson |
Antonio Scroggins and Ed Gonzalez |
4:2021cv01567 |
May 7, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Andrew S Hanen |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 MOTION to Reopen Case by Drew Patterson, filed. Motion Docket Date 6/24/2021. (dnoriega, 1) |
Filing 5 FINAL JUDGMENT. Case terminated on 5/15/2021(Signed by Judge Andrew S Hanen) Parties notified.(jdav, 4) |
Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying #2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Email sent to Manager of Three Strikes List. Plaintiffs motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 2) is DENIED. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). Plaintiff may move to reopen this case only if he pays the filing fee of $402.00 within thirty days of the date of this Order. 4. All pending motions, if any, are DENIED as MOOT. (Signed by Judge Andrew S Hanen) Parties notified.(jdav, 4) |
Filing 3 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (JosephWells, 4) |
Filing 2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Drew Patterson, filed. Motion Docket Date 5/28/2021. (JosephWells, 4) |
Filing 1 Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402) filed by Drew Patterson.(JosephWells, 4) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.