Sacriste v. Texas A&M University
Stephanie Sacriste |
Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas and Texas A&M University |
4:2021cv01805 |
June 3, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
David Hittner |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 NOTICE of Resetting. Parties notified. Initial Conference reset for 10/20/2021 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 703 before Magistrate Judge Peter Bray, filed. (ealexander, 4) |
Filing 5 Joint MOTION for Continuance of Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference by Texas A&M University, filed. Motion Docket Date 8/18/2021. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Wetzel, Melinda) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Melinda J. Wetzel on behalf of Texas A&M University, filed. (Wetzel, Melinda) |
Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Texas A&M University served on 6/7/2021, answer due 8/6/2021, filed.(Greenstein, Malcolm) |
Filing 2 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 8/11/2021 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 703 before Magistrate Judge Peter Bray. (Signed by Judge David Hittner) Parties notified.(JacquelineMataadi, 4) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Stephanie Sacriste (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0541-26541913) filed by Stephanie Sacriste.(Greenstein, Malcolm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.