McBayne et al v. Marmaxx Operating Corp. et al
| Angelena McBayne and Tyrone McBayne |
| Cintas Corporation No. 2, Marmaxx Operating Corp., Marmaxx Operating Corp. doing business as Marshall's Homegoods and Cintas Corporation No. 2 doing business as Cintas Corporation doing business as Cintas Fire Protection |
| 4:2021cv01949 |
| June 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Lee H Rosenthal |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
SCHEDULING AND DOCKET CONTROL ORDER. Pltf Expert Report due by 9/10/2021. Deft Expert Report due by 10/29/2021. Discovery due by 11/12/2021. Mediation due by 10/29/2021. Joint Pretrial Order due by 12/3/2021. Docket Call set for 12/10/2021 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 11B before Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal(Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(gclair, 4)
|
| Filing 14 Minute entry for proceedings before the Hon. Lee H. Rosenthal. Initial conference held on August 10, 2021. A scheduling order will be entered separately. Appearances: P. Wayne Pickering, Kevin Tompkins, William Farmer.(Court Reporter: K. Miller), filed.(leddins, 4) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Resetting. Parties notified. Initial Conference reset for 8/10/2021 at 02:20 PM by video before Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal, filed. NOTE: The change is to TIME only. A Zoom link will be provided. (leddins, 4) |
| Filing 12 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Cintas Corporation No. 2, filed.(Pickering, P.) |
| Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Angelena McBayne, filed.(Stogner, Brant) |
| Filing 10 PROPOSED ORDER Scheduling and Docket Control Order, filed.(Stogner, Brant) |
| Filing 9 JOINT DISCOVERY/CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN by Angelena McBayne, filed.(Stogner, Brant) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Resetting. Parties notified. Initial Conference reset for 8/10/2021 at 10:30 AM by video before Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal, filed. A Zoom link will be provided for participation. (leddins, 4) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by L. Nichole Wooten on behalf of Cintas Corporation No. 2, filed. (Wooten, Lashandra) |
| Filing 6 AMENDED ANSWER to #1 State Court Petition/Notice of Removal with Jury by Cintas Corporation No. 2, filed.(ShoshanaArnow, 4) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #4 Motion for Leave to File Amended Answer.(Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(ShoshanaArnow, 4)
|
| Filing 4 Unopposed MOTION for Leave to File Amended Answer by Cintas Corporation No. 2, filed. Motion Docket Date 7/14/2021. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Pickering, P.) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER Scheduling Rule 16 Conference With the Court and Setting Out the Requirements for Initial Pretrial Work. Initial Conference set for 8/6/2021 at 09:30 AM by video before Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal. A Zoom link will be provided for participation. (Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) (Attachments: #1 Supplement) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
|
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Marmaxx Operating Corp., filed.(Tompkins, Kevin) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 61st Harris County District Court, case number 202130704 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0541-26598502) filed by Marmaxx Operating Corp.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Tompkins, Kevin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
