Foster v. Saul
| Stephanie Foster |
| Andrew Saul and Andrew M. Saul |
| 4:2021cv02031 |
| June 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Lynn N Hughes |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to Andrew M. Saul served on 6/28/2021, answer due 8/27/2021, filed.(Osterhout, Karl)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Karl Osterhout to Appear Pro Hac Vice.(Signed by Judge Lynn N Hughes) Parties notified.(gkelner, 4)
|
|
Filing 5
Summons Issued as to Andrew Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. Issued summons returned to plaintiff by First-class mail, filed. (Attachments: #1 Continuation, #2 Continuation)(DesireeSillas, 4)
|
|
Filing 4
CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Stephanie Foster, filed.(Osterhout, Karl)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for Karl E. Osterhout to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Stephanie Foster, filed. Motion Docket Date 7/13/2021. (Osterhout, Karl)
|
|
Filing 2
Request for Issuance of Summons as to Andrew Saul, Attorney General of United States, Assistant US Attorney, filed. (Attachments: #1 Summons to Attorney General, #2 Summons to OGC)(Osterhout, Karl)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0541-26627784) filed by Stephanie Foster. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Osterhout, Karl)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
