CITGO Petroleum Corporation v. Teknik Trading Inc.
| CITGO Petroleum Corporation |
| Teknik Trading Inc. |
| 4:2021cv02086 |
| June 25, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| George C Hanks |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 Agreed MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond by CITGO Petroleum Corporation, filed. Motion Docket Date 9/13/2021. (Perry, Nicole) |
| Filing 18 Agreed MOTION to Amend by CITGO Petroleum Corporation, filed. Motion Docket Date 9/13/2021. (Perry, Nicole) |
| Filing 17 ANSWER to #1 Complaint,, COUNTERCLAIM against CITGO Petroleum Corporation by Teknik Trading Inc., filed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Commercial Agreement, #2 Exhibit B - E-mail Chain, #3 Exhibit C - License)(Stratton, Charles) |
Filing 16
ORDER granting #12 Motion for Nima Tahmassebi to Appear Pro Hac Vice.(Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(jguajardo, 4)
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER granting #13 Motion for Paul Turner to Appear Pro Hac Vice.(Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(jguajardo, 4)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER granting #11 Motion for Benjamin Reiss to Appear Pro Hac Vice.(Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(jguajardo, 4)
|
| Filing 13 MOTION for Paul Turner to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Teknik Trading Inc., filed. Motion Docket Date 8/5/2021. (Stratton, Charles) |
| Filing 12 MOTION for Nima Tahmassebi to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Teknik Trading Inc., filed. Motion Docket Date 8/5/2021. (Stratton, Charles) |
| Filing 11 MOTION for Benjamin Reiss to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Teknik Trading Inc., filed. Motion Docket Date 8/5/2021. (Stratton, Charles) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #8 Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time Responses due by 8/3/2021..(Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(jguajardo, 4)
|
| Filing 9 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Teknik Trading Inc., filed.(Stratton, Charles) |
| Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint and Request for Injunctive Relief by Teknik Trading Inc., filed. Motion Docket Date 8/3/2021. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Stratton, Charles) |
| Filing 7 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to Teknik Trading Inc. served on 6/29/2021, answer due 7/20/2021, filed.(Perry, Nicole) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by J. Laurens Wilkes on behalf of CITGO Petroleum Corporation, filed. (Wilkes, John) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Teknik Trading Inc.. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(hlerma, 4) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 11/17/2021 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 600 in Houston before Magistrate Judge Andrew M Edison. (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(MelissaMorganadi, 4)
|
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by CITGO Petroleum Corporation identifying CITGO Holding, Inc., PDV Holding, Inc., and Petroleos de Venezuela, S.A. as Corporate Parent, filed.(Perry, Nicole) |
| Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Teknik Trading Inc., filed.(Perry, Nicole) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Teknik Trading Inc. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0541-26653698) filed by CITGO Petroleum Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, Agreement, #2 Exhibit B, Letter from Auction Company Postponing Action Until After July 13, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Perry, Nicole) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
