Franco v. Georgia-Pacific LLC et al
| Ariana Franco |
| Georgia-Pacific Panel Products, LLC, Georgia-Pacific LLC, Inc. Koch Industries, Koch Business Solutions, LP, Hyster-Yale Group, Allied Systems Company and Koch Industries, Inc. |
| 4:2021cv02097 |
| June 28, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Andrew S Hanen |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 ANSWER to #13 Amended Complaint/Counterclaim/Crossclaim etc. with Jury Demand by Allied Systems Company, filed.(Bradley, David) |
| Filing 15 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint by Georgia-Pacific Panel Products, LLC, filed. Motion Docket Date 8/30/2021. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(McDowell, David) |
| Filing 14 RESPONSE to #6 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , #5 MOTION to Dismiss , filed by Ariana Franco. (Aziz, Muhammad) |
| Filing 13 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Ariana Franco.(Aziz, Muhammad) |
| Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Hyster-Yale Group, filed.(Tucker, Pryce) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by William B. Thomas on behalf of Georgia-Pacific LLC, Georgia-Pacific Panel Products, LLC, Koch Business Solutions, LP, Koch Industries, Inc., filed. (Thomas, William) |
| Filing 10 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Georgia-Pacific LLC, Georgia-Pacific Panel Products, LLC, Koch Business Solutions, LP, Koch Industries, Inc. identifying Koch Industries, Inc. as Corporate Parent, filed.(McDowell, David) |
| Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Ariana Franco, filed.(Aziz, Muhammad) |
| Filing 8 PROPOSED ORDER Granting Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss re: #6 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , filed.(McDowell, David) |
| Filing 7 PROPOSED ORDER Granting Rule 12(b)(2) Motion to Dismiss re: #5 MOTION to Dismiss , filed.(McDowell, David) |
| Filing 6 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Georgia-Pacific LLC, Georgia-Pacific Panel Products, LLC, Koch Business Solutions, LP, Koch Industries, Inc., filed. Motion Docket Date 7/27/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(McDowell, David) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss by Georgia-Pacific LLC, Koch Business Solutions, LP, Koch Industries, Inc., filed. Motion Docket Date 7/27/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3)(McDowell, David) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Hyster-Yale Group, filed.(Tucker, Pryce) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Consent and Joinder in Removal by Hyster-Yale Group, filed. (Tucker, Pryce) |
Filing 2
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 2/24/2022 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 704 before Magistrate Judge Frances H Stacy. (Signed by Judge Andrew S Hanen) Parties notified.(ClaudiaGutierrezadi, 4)
|
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 151st Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas, case number 202131831 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0541-26656398) filed by Georgia-Pacific Panel Products, LLC, Georgia-Pacific LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit Exhibit J, #11 Civil Cover Sheet)(McDowell, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
