Texas Elite Exotics, LLC v. Bridgestone Retail Operations, LLC
| Texas Elite Exotics, LLC |
| Bridgestone Retail Operations, LLC |
| 4:2021cv02182 |
| July 6, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Keith P Ellison |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 JOINT DISCOVERY/CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN by Bridgestone Retail Operations, LLC, filed.(Trent, Thomas) |
Filing 9
SCHEDULING ORDER. Jury. Amended Pleadings due by 4/15/2022. Joinder of Parties due by 10/15/2021 Pltf Expert Witness List due by 2/4/2022. Deft Expert Witness List due by 3/4/2022. Discovery due by 4/29/2022. Dispositive Motion Filing due by 6/13/2022. Non-Dispositive Motion Filing due by 6/13/2022. Joint Pretrial Order due by 9/6/2022. Jury Trial set for 9/12/2022 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3A Houston before Judge Keith P Ellison(Signed by Judge Keith P Ellison) Parties notified.(gkelner, 4)
|
| Filing 8 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Texas Elite Exotics, LLC, filed.(Green, William) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Texas Elite Exotics, LLC, filed.(Green, William) |
| Filing 6 Notice Regarding Initial Conference(Signed by Judge Keith P Ellison) Parties notified.(arrivera, 4) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Certificate of Service in Removed Action re: #2 Order for Initial Conference - FORM, by Bridgestone Retail Operations, LLC, filed. (Trent, Thomas) |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Bridgestone Retail Operations, LLC, filed.(Trent, Thomas) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Bridgestone Retail Operations, LLC, filed.(Trent, Thomas) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 10/15/2021 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 3A Houston before Judge Keith P Ellison. (Signed by Judge Keith P Ellison) Parties notified.(DesireeSillasadi, 4)
|
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 284th Judicial District Court of Montgomery County, Texas, case number 21-06-07691 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0541-26694616) filed by Bridgestone Retail Operations, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Civil Cover Sheet (Exhibit H))(Trent, Thomas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Texas Elite Exotics, LLC v. Bridgestone Retail Operations, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Texas Elite Exotics, LLC | |
| Represented By: | William T. Green, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Bridgestone Retail Operations, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Thomas Christopher Trent |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
