Doe 1 et al v. Uber Technologies Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2
Defendant: Uber Technologies Inc., Lyft Inc and JOHN DOE
Case Number: 4:2021cv02285
Filed: July 14, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: George C Hanks
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 30, 2021 Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Lyft Inc, filed.(Nelson, Joelle)
July 28, 2021 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Uber Technologies Inc., filed.(Parsons, Claire)
July 20, 2021 Filing 3 ANSWER to #1 State Court Petition/Notice of Removal with Jury Demand by Lyft Inc, filed.(Nelson, Joelle)
July 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 12/15/2021 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 600 in Houston before Magistrate Judge Andrew M Edison. (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(JacquelineMataadi, 4)
July 14, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Harris County District Court, case number 2021-35012 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0541-26746042) filed by Uber Technologies Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Index of Pleadings, #3 Exhibit List of Attorneys, #4 Exhibit A-1 - Docket Sheet, #5 Exhibit A-2 - Request For Issuance of Service to Uber - 6.10.21, #6 Exhibit A-3 - Request For Issuance of Service Lyft Inc - 6.10.21, #7 Exhibit A-4 - Plaintiffs Original Petition - 6.10.21, #8 Exhibit A-5 - Return of Service - LYFT INC, #9 Exhibit A-6 - Return of Service - UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC, #10 Exhibit A-7 - Defendant Uber Tech Original Ax to Pltffs Orginal Petition)(Parsons, Claire)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Doe 1 et al v. Uber Technologies Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jane Doe 1
Represented By: Kyle Patrick Malone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jane Doe 2
Represented By: Kyle Patrick Malone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Uber Technologies Inc.
Represented By: Claire Winniford Parsons
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lyft Inc
Represented By: Joelle Grace Nelson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN DOE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?