Bolivar v. Love's Corporation et al
| Simon Jose Bolivar |
| Love's Corporation and Randal Crowe |
| 4:2021cv02360 |
| July 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Andrew S Hanen |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2003 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
MOTION for Extension of Time To Answer or Otherwise to Respond to Plaintiffs Complaint by Love's Corporation, filed. Motion Docket Date 9/14/2021. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Order Granting Extension of Time)(Korn, David)
|
|
Filing 5
RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to Love's Corporation served on 7/29/2021, answer due 8/19/2021, filed.(ShoshanaArnow, 4)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (gclairadi, 4)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 2/24/2022 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 704 before Magistrate Judge Frances H Stacy. (Signed by Judge Andrew S Hanen) Parties notified.(gclairadi, 4)
|
|
Filing 2
Summons Issued as to Love's Corporation. Issued summons delivered to US Marshal with USM -285 for service, filed.(gclair, 4)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Randal Crowe, Love's Corporation filed by Simon Jose Bolivar. Application to Proceed IFP Granted on 7/16/2021 by Judge Gilmore.(gclair, 4)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
