Onyenobi v. US Department of Homeland Security, et el.
Plaintiff: CHINEDU ONYENOBI
Defendant: US Department of Homeland Security, et el., US Department of Homeland Security, Alexander Mayorkas, Tracy Renaud, Wallace Carroll, Tae D. Johnson and Patrick Contreras
Case Number: 4:2021cv02476
Filed: July 30, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: David Hittner
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 702
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER that the Unopposed motion to continue responsive pleading deadline and the scheduling conference is granted. Defendants shall file a responsive pleading by November 1, 2021. The initial scheduling conference is reset to November 23, 2021 at 10:00 a.m. before Judge Bray. (Signed by Judge David Hittner) Parties notified.(ealexander, 4)
September 23, 2021 ***Set/Reset Hearings: Initial Conference set for 11/23/2021 at 10:00 AM in by video before Magistrate Judge Peter Bray (ealexander, 4)
September 22, 2021 Filing 3 Unopposed MOTION for Continuance of Defendants' Responsive Pleading Deadline and the Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference by Wallace Carroll, Patrick Contreras, Tae D. Johnson, Alexander Mayorkas, Tracy Renaud, US Department of Homeland Security, filed. Motion Docket Date 10/13/2021. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Cravens, Annalisa)
August 10, 2021 Summons Issued as to U.S. Attorney. Issued summons returned to plaintiff in person, filed.(MelissaMorgan, 4)
August 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 10/21/2021 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 703 before Magistrate Judge Peter Bray. (Signed by Judge David Hittner) Parties notified.(ClaudiaGutierrezadi, 4)
August 2, 2021 Summons Issued as to US Department of Homeland Security,ALEXANDER MAYORKAS, TRACY RENAUD, ACTING DIRECTOR, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, WALLACE CARROLL, HOUSTON FIELD OFFICE DIRECTOR, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES , TAE D. JOHNSON, ACTING DIRECTOR, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, PATRICK CONTRERAS, HOUSTON FIELD OFFICE DIRECTOR, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. Issued summons returned to plaintiff in person, filed.(gclair, 4) Modified on 8/2/2021 (gclair, 4).
July 30, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0541-26826397) filed by CHINEDU ONYENOBI. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 4)(McCollom, James)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Onyenobi v. US Department of Homeland Security, et el.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CHINEDU ONYENOBI
Represented By: James P McCollom, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: US Department of Homeland Security, et el.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: US Department of Homeland Security
Represented By: Annalisa L. Cravens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alexander Mayorkas
Represented By: Annalisa L. Cravens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tracy Renaud
Represented By: Annalisa L. Cravens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wallace Carroll
Represented By: Annalisa L. Cravens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tae D. Johnson
Represented By: Annalisa L. Cravens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Patrick Contreras
Represented By: Annalisa L. Cravens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?