Amador Gonzalez et al v. Harris County et al
| Miguel Amador Gonzalez and K.M. |
| HARRIS COUNTY, Harris County Constable Office Precinct 4, Nathaniel Dillard, Mendella Martin Carter and Vicente Medina |
| 4:2021cv02671 |
| August 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Lynn N Hughes |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 25
NOTICE of Appearance by R. Matthew Quiroz on behalf of Miguel Amador Gonzalez, K.M., filed. (Acevedo-Carlson, Kevin)
|
|
Filing 24
Partial DISMISSAL. Gonzalez's claims against Harris County Constable's Precinct, Harris County, Nathaniel Dillard, and Mendella Carter - in their official capacities only - are dismissed #15 . Gonzalez's Texas Tort Claim Act, Equal Protection, and punitive damages claims are also dismissed. (Signed by Judge Lynn N Hughes) Parties notified. (ghassan, 4)
|
|
Filing 23
OPINION on Partial Dismissal. (Signed by Judge Lynn N Hughes) Parties notified. (ghassan, 4)
|
|
Filing 22
REPLY to #21 Response in Opposition to Motion , filed by Mendella Martin Carter, Nathaniel Dillard, Harris County, Harris County Constable Office Precinct 4, Vicente Medina. (Bradley, Suzanne)
|
|
Filing 21
RESPONSE in Opposition to #15 MOTION to Dismiss #1 Complaint , filed by Miguel Amador Gonzalez, K.M.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Mendoza, Victoria)
|
|
Filing 20
Extension ORDER terminating #19 . By 9/24/2021, the plaintiffs may respond to the motion to dismiss. By 10/1/2021, the defendants may reply. (Signed by Judge Lynn N Hughes) Parties notified. (ghassan, 4)
|
|
Filing 19
Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time Plaintiffs' Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Original Complaint by Miguel Amador Gonzalez, K.M., filed. Motion Docket Date 10/7/2021. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order on P Extension of Time)(Mendoza, Victoria)
|
|
Filing 18
ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Mendella Martin Carter, Nathaniel Dillard, filed.(Bradley, Suzanne)
|
|
Filing 17
Partial DISMISSAL. Having been advised Gonzalez no longer wishes to pursue the claims against Vicente Medina, the claims against Medina are dismissed without prejudice #16 . (Signed by Judge Lynn N Hughes) Parties notified. (ghassan, 4)
|
|
Filing 16
NOTICE of Dismissal as to Vicente Medina by Miguel Amador Gonzalez, K.M., filed. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Mendoza, Victoria)
|
|
Filing 15
MOTION to Dismiss #1 Complaint by Mendella Martin Carter, Nathaniel Dillard, Harris County, Harris County Constable Office Precinct 4, Vicente Medina, filed. Motion Docket Date 9/17/2021. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Draper, Brandon)
|
|
Filing 14
INITIAL DISCLOSURES by Mendella Martin Carter, Nathaniel Dillard, Vicente Medina, filed.(Bradley, Suzanne)
|
|
Filing 13
CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Mendella Martin Carter, Nathaniel Dillard, Vicente Medina, filed.(Bradley, Suzanne)
|
|
Filing 12
NOTICE of Appearance by VICTORIA MENDOZA on behalf of Miguel Amador Gonzalez, K.M., filed. (Acevedo-Carlson, Kevin)
|
|
Filing 11
RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to Harris County Constable Office Precinct 4 served on 8/23/2021, answer due 10/22/2021, filed.(Acevedo-Carlson, Kevin)
|
|
Filing 10
RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to Harris County served on 8/23/2021, answer due 10/22/2021, filed.(Acevedo-Carlson, Kevin)
|
|
Filing 9
RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to Vicente Medina served on 8/19/2021, answer due 10/18/2021, filed.(Acevedo-Carlson, Kevin)
|
|
Filing 8
RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to Nathaniel Dillard served on 8/19/2021, answer due 10/18/2021, filed.(Acevedo-Carlson, Kevin)
|
|
Filing 7
RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to Mendella Martin Carter served on 8/19/2021, answer due 10/18/2021, filed.(Acevedo-Carlson, Kevin)
|
|
Filing 6
Summons Issued as to Harris County, Harris County Constable Office Precinct 4. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(JacquelineMata, 4)
|
|
Filing 5
Request for Issuance of Summons as to Harris County, Harris County Constable Office Precinct 4, filed. (Attachments: #1 Unredacted attachment)(Acevedo-Carlson, Kevin)
|
|
Filing 4
Summons Issued as to Mendella Martin Carter, Nathaniel Dillard, Vicente Medina. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(JacquelineMata, 4)
|
|
Summons Not Issued as to Harris County, Harris County Constable Office Precinct 4 due to these deficiencies: The defendant's name must be listed first and the c/o/registered agent second. Attorney or Plaintiff notified of deficiencies by NEF, filed.(JacquelineMata, 4) Modified on 8/19/2021 (JacquelineMata, 4).
|
|
Filing 3
Request for Issuance of Summons as to All Defendants, filed. (Attachments: #1 Unredacted attachment, #2 Unredacted attachment, #3 Unredacted attachment, #4 Unredacted attachment)(Acevedo-Carlson, Kevin)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER FOR CONFERENCE. Initial Conference set for 11/8/2021 at 10:30 AM in Room 11122 before Judge Lynn N Hughes (Signed by Judge Lynn N Hughes) Parties notified.(JosephWellsadi, 4)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Mendella Martin Carter, Nathaniel Dillard, HARRIS COUNTY, Harris County Constable Office Precinct 4, Vicente Medina (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0541-26904342) filed by Miguel Amador Gonzalez.(Acevedo-Carlson, Kevin)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
