Xia v. Mayorkas et al
| Jun Xia |
| Alejandro Mayorkas, Merrick Garland and Norma Limon |
| 4:2021cv02672 |
| August 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Lynn N Hughes |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Final DISMISSAL. On 8/20/2021, Xia's I-485 application was approved. The complaint is dismissed as moot #4 . Case terminated on 9/30/2021. (Signed by Judge Lynn N Hughes) Parties notified. (ghassan, 4) |
| Filing 4 Unopposed MOTION to Dismiss #1 Complaint as Moot by Merrick Garland, Norma Limon, Alejandro Mayorkas, filed. Motion Docket Date 10/20/2021. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Robinson-Gaither, Eleanor) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Merrick Garland, Norma Limon, Alejandro Mayorkas, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General, filed.(gclair, 4) |
| Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Merrick Garland, Norma Limon, Alejandro Mayorkas, filed. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Proposed Order, #3 Proposed Order)(Chien, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Merrick Garland, Norma Limon, Alejandro Mayorkas (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0541-26904570) filed by Jun Xia. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit)(Chien, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
