UGORJI v. Toyota Financial Services
| FELIX UGORJI |
| Toyota Financial Services |
| 4:2021cv02884 |
| September 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Sim Lake |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
FINAL JUDGMENT - In accordance with the court's Memorandum Opinion and Order granting Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Each party is responsible for its own costs...*** Case terminated on 10/19/21. (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified.(sanderson, 4)
|
|
Filing 9
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - For the reasons explained, the court concludes that Plaintiff has not stated a plausible claim to relief. Accordingly,Defendant Toyota Motor Credit Corporation's #5 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint and Incorporated Memorandum of Law is GRANTED, and this action will be dismissed with prejudice. (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified.(sanderson, 4)
|
|
Filing 8
JOINT DISCOVERY/CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN by Toyota Financial Services, filed.(Robertson, George)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION for Wesley Ridout to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Toyota Financial Services, filed. Motion Docket Date 10/25/2021. (RachelSalazar, 4)
|
|
Filing 6
INITIAL DISCLOSURES by Toyota Financial Services, filed.(Robertson, George)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint and Incorporated Memorandum of Law by Toyota Financial Services, filed. Motion Docket Date 10/8/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Proposed Order)(Robertson, George)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER - Granting #3 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint ; Answer due for Toyota Financial Services 9/17/2021. (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified.(sanderson, 4)
|
|
Filing 3
Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Toyota Financial Services, filed. Motion Docket Date 9/30/2021. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Robertson, George)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 10/22/2021 at 03:00 PM in Courtroom 9B before Judge Sim Lake. (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified.(sanderson, 4)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Justice Court Precinct 5 Place 2, case number 215200218949 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0541-26991611) filed by Toyota Financial Services. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Robertson, George)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: UGORJI v. Toyota Financial Services | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: FELIX UGORJI | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Toyota Financial Services | |
| Represented By: | George Gostin Robertson |
| Represented By: | Wesley Ridout |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
