Mendoza v. Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless et al
Nories Evette Mendoza |
Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless, Verizon Wireless Services, LLC, Verizon Wireless Texas, LLC and Cellco Partnership doing business as Verizon Wirreless |
4:2021cv02982 |
September 13, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Lee H Rosenthal |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 451 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Stephen E. Hart on behalf of Cellco Partnership, Verizon Wireless Services, LLC, Verizon Wireless Texas, LLC, filed. (Hart, Stephen) |
Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Cellco Partnership, Verizon Wireless Services, LLC, Verizon Wireless Texas, LLC, filed.(Hunter, Veronica) |
![]() |
Filing 4 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time for Defendants to File an Answer to Plaintiff's Original Complaint by Cellco Partnership, Verizon Wireless Services, LLC, Verizon Wireless Texas, LLC, filed. Motion Docket Date 11/2/2021. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Unopposed Motion to Extend Time for Defendants to File an Answer to Plaintiff's Original Complaint)(Hunter, Veronica) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0541-27036020) filed by Nories Evette Mendoza.(Leeds, Jacques) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.