Rivera v. United States of America et al
| Erik Ivan Rivera |
| Michelle Ortiz, Amberlyn McArtney, The State Of Texas, The State Bar Of Texas and United States of America |
| 4:2021cv03072 |
| September 20, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Lee H Rosenthal |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis.(Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(gclair, 4)
|
|
Filing 6
Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Erik Ivan Rivera, filed. (BrandisIsom, 4)
|
|
Filing 5
CONSENT to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge by Erik Ivan Rivera, filed.(ShannonHolden, 4)
|
|
Filing 4
CLERKS NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING as to Erik Ivan Rivera. Parties notified Notice of Compliance due by 10/22/2021, filed. (bgoolsby, 4)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (BrandisIsom, 4)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Erik Ivan Rivera, filed. Motion Docket Date 10/12/2021. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(BrandisIsom, 4)
|
|
Filing 1
Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402) filed by Erik Ivan Rivera.(BrandisIsom, 4)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
