Waldrup v. Maginnis et al
| Dewayne Lee Waldrup |
| Patty Maginnis, Paul Damico, Modesto Rosales, Jackie Rodriguez, Inger Chandler, Thomas Epperson, Sgt. P. Hahs, Unknown Parole Officers and Rand Henderson |
| 4:2021cv03106 |
| September 24, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| George C Hanks |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Change of Address by Dewayne Lee Waldrup, filed. (BrandisIsom, 4)
|
|
Filing 6
CLERKS NOTICE to Prisoner. Parties notified, filed. (Attachments: #1 Appendix) (bgoolsby, 4)
|
|
Filing 5
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER STAYING CASE. Case administratively closed on 9/29/2021(Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(jguajardo, 4)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (jguajardo, 4)
|
|
Filing 3
COPY OF ORDER FILED IN CASE NO. 4-20-CV-3451 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER TO SEVER. (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(jguajardo, 4)
|
|
Filing 2
First AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Dewayne Lee Waldrup. Related document: #1 Complaint filed by Dewayne Lee Waldrup.(jguajardo, 4)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Dewayne Lee Waldrup.(jguajardo, 4)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
