Padilla et al v. RSL Contractors Ltd. et al
| Jose Padilla and Bolivar Pineda Ortiz |
| RSL Contractors Ltd. and RL & SL, LLC |
| 4:2021cv03329 |
| October 11, 2021 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Lee H Rosenthal |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #5 Motion to Stay Proceedings. (Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(gclair, 4)
|
| Filing 5 Joint MOTION to Stay by Jose Padilla, Bolivar Pineda Ortiz, filed. Motion Docket Date 12/1/2021. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Pham, Duchoang) |
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to All Defendants, filed.(Pham, Duchoang) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER on Initial Discovery Protocols for FLSA.(Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER Scheduling Rule 16 Conference With the Court and Setting Out the Requirements for Initial Pretrial Work. Initial Conference set for 1/28/2022 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 11B before Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal. (Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) (Attachments: #1 Attachments) Parties notified.(RachelWillborgadi, 4)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0541-27173469) filed by Jose Padilla, Bolivar Pineda Ortiz. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit)(Pham, Duchoang) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
