Martinelli v. Hearst Newspapers, LLC
| Antonio Martinelli |
| Hearst Newspapers, LLC |
| 4:2021cv03412 |
| October 18, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| David Hittner |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 REPLY in Support of #11 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , filed by Hearst Newspapers, LLC. (Boyer, Nathaniel) |
| Filing 14 RESPONSE in Opposition to #11 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , filed by Antonio Martinelli. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Sanders, Craig) |
Filing 13
ORDER granting #12 Motion for Nathaniel S. Boyer to Appear Pro Hac Vice.(Signed by Judge David Hittner) Parties notified.(ealexander, 4)
|
| Filing 12 MOTION for Nathaniel S. Boyer to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Hearst Newspapers, LLC, filed. Motion Docket Date 12/8/2021. (Sitwala, Ravi) |
| Filing 11 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Hearst Newspapers, LLC, filed. Motion Docket Date 12/3/2021. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Sitwala, Ravi) |
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Hearst Newspapers, LLC, filed.(Sitwala, Ravi) |
| Filing 9 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Hearst Newspapers, LLC identifying Hearst Corporation as Corporate Parent, filed.(Sitwala, Ravi) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Ravi V. Sitwala on behalf of Hearst Newspapers, LLC, filed. (Sitwala, Ravi) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Antonio Martinelli, filed.(Sanders, Craig) |
| Filing 6 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to Hearst Newspapers, LLC served on 10/22/2021, answer due 11/12/2021, filed.(Sanders, Craig) |
| Filing 5 Register of Copyrights Notified. AO-121, filed. (BrandisIsom, 4) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 1/4/2022 at 10:15 AM in Courtroom 703 before Magistrate Judge Peter Bray. (Signed by Judge David Hittner) Parties notified.(BrandisIsom, 4)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Hearst Newspapers, LLC. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(RachelSalazar, 4) |
| Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Hearst Newspapers, LLC, filed.(Sanders, Craig) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Hearst Newspapers, LLC (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0541-27206770) filed by Antonio Martinelli. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sanders, Craig) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Martinelli v. Hearst Newspapers, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Antonio Martinelli | |
| Represented By: | Craig B Sanders |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Hearst Newspapers, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Nathaniel S Boyer |
| Represented By: | Ravi V Sitwala |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
