Massoud v. Amerom,, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Emad L Massoud
Defendant: Amerom,, Inc. doing business as Western Eagle Security, Sammy Malak and Osama Malak
Case Number: 4:2021cv03438
Filed: October 19, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Alfred H Bennett
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 13, 2021 Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Amerom,, Inc., Osama Malak, Sammy Malak, filed.(Cicack, Walter)
December 13, 2021 Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Amerom,, Inc., Osama Malak, Sammy Malak, filed.(Cicack, Walter)
November 2, 2021 Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Sammy Malak served on 10/22/2021, answer due 12/21/2021, filed.(Siurek, Mark)
November 2, 2021 Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Osama Malak served on 10/22/2021, answer due 12/21/2021, filed.(Siurek, Mark)
November 2, 2021 Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Amerom,, Inc. served on 10/22/2021, answer due 12/21/2021, filed.(Siurek, Mark)
October 21, 2021 Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Emad L Massoud, filed.(Siurek, Mark)
October 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 1/14/2022 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 8C before Judge Alfred H Bennett. (Signed by Judge Alfred H Bennett) Parties notified.(RachelSalazaradi, 4)
October 20, 2021 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Amerom, Inc., Osama Malak, Sammy Malak. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(RachelWillborg, 4)
October 19, 2021 Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to All Defendants, filed. (Attachments: #1 Appendix, #2 Appendix)(Siurek, Mark)
October 19, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Amerom,, Inc., Osama Malak, Sammy Malak (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0541-27217834) filed by Emad L Massoud. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Siurek, Mark)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Massoud v. Amerom,, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Emad L Massoud
Represented By: Mark Siurek
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Amerom,, Inc. doing business as Western Eagle Security
Represented By: Walter J Cicack
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sammy Malak
Represented By: Walter J Cicack
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Osama Malak
Represented By: Walter J Cicack
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?