Lewis-Cummings v. Amazon.com Services, LLC
Chantel Lewis-Cummings |
Amazon.com Services, LLC |
4:2021cv03496 |
October 22, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
George C Hanks |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Amazon.com Services, LLC, filed.(MacDowall, Luke) |
Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Amazon.com Services, LLC, filed.(Anand, Nehal) |
Filing 9 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to Amazon.com Services, LLC served on 11/3/2021, answer due 11/24/2021, filed.(BrandisIsom, 4) |
The above entitled action is assigned to United States District Judge George C. Hanks, Jr. Attorneys and Pro Se individuals are responsible for complying with this Court's rules and procedures, specifically, under Rule 6. Motion Practice. B. Pre-Motion Conferences Required for Particular Motions. Please download and review the individual practices of the assigned District Judge, located at: https://www.txs.uscourts.gov/sites/txs/files/GCH_Court_Procedures_09.2021.pdf. (Note: If clicking the link does not work, you can copy/paste the url into your web browser address bar to view the procedures.) (bthomas, 4) |
Filing 8 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER. (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(bthomas, 4) |
Filing 7 ORDER on Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action.(Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(bthomas, 4) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Amazon.com Services, LLC. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(RachelSalazar, 4) |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Chantel Lewis-Cummings, filed.(Peckham, Charles) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Mary A. Martin on behalf of Chantel Lewis-Cummings, filed. (Peckham, Charles) |
Filing 3 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Amazon.com Services, LLC, filed.(Peckham, Charles) |
Filing 2 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 4/13/2022 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 600 in Houston before Magistrate Judge Andrew M Edison. (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(ShannonHoldenadi, 4) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Amazon.com Services, LLC (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0541-27239156) filed by Chantel Lewis-Cummings.(Peckham, Charles) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Lewis-Cummings v. Amazon.com Services, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Chantel Lewis-Cummings | |
Represented By: | Charles Henry Peckham |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Amazon.com Services, LLC | |
Represented By: | Nehal Shah Anand |
Represented By: | Luke Christopher MacDowall |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.