Davis et al v. Shaw et al
Plaintiff: Jim Robert Davis and Roma David Whitten
Defendant: Richard Wayne Shaw and Certified Express Inc.
Case Number: 4:2021cv03543
Filed: October 27, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Kenneth M Hoyt
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 7, 2021 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Richard Wayne Shaw, filed.(Thibodeaux, Lee)
November 23, 2021 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Jim Robert Davis, Roma David Whitten, filed.(Chapel, Kyle)
November 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference by Telephone and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Counsel who filed or removed the action is responsible for placing the conference call and insuring that all parties are on the line. The call shall be placed to (713)250-5613. Telephone Conference set for 3/3/2022 at 08:45 AM before Judge Kenneth M Hoyt.(Signed by Judge Kenneth M Hoyt) Parties notified.(chorace)
October 27, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 55th Judicial District Court, Harris County, Texas, case number 2021-55271 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0541-27257319) filed by Richard Wayne Shaw, Certified Express Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Notice of Removal, #2 Unredacted attachment Certified Copy of Civil Court Docket Sheet, #3 Exhibit Consent to Removal - Certified Express, Inc., #4 Exhibit Corporate Disclosure Statement, #5 Exhibit Index of Documents, #6 Exhibit List of Parties, Attorneys and Court, #7 Unredacted attachment Plaintiff's Original Petition with Citations, #8 Unredacted attachment Request for Issuance of Service, #9 Unredacted attachment Return of Service - Certified Express, Inc., #10 Unredacted attachment Return of Service - Richard Wayne Shaw)(Thibodeaux, Lee)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Davis et al v. Shaw et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jim Robert Davis
Represented By: Michael Elton Pierce
Represented By: Kyle William Chapel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Roma David Whitten
Represented By: Michael Elton Pierce
Represented By: Kyle William Chapel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Richard Wayne Shaw
Represented By: Lee D Thibodeaux
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Certified Express Inc.
Represented By: Lee D Thibodeaux
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?