Hinton v. Williams et al
| Kelvin Hinton |
| Betty J Williams, Jane Doe Nurses #1-4, Lieutenant Chisolm and Khari Mott |
| 4:2021cv03556 |
| October 27, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Gray H Miller |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing Fee Filing fee: $402 re: #1 Complaint, receipt number 105665, filed. (hlerma, 4) |
Filing 5
ORDER denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis.The filing fee is due within 30 days from the date of this order. Plaintiffs failure to comply timely and fully with this order will result in dismissal of this lawsuit for non-payment of the filing fee.(Signed by Judge Gray H Miller) Parties notified.(rguerrero, 4)
|
| Filing 4 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Kelvin Hinton, filed. (ShannonHolden, 4) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (ShannonHolden, 4) |
| Filing 2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Hinton Kelvin, filed. Motion Docket Date 11/17/2021. (ShannonHolden, 4) |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against Jane Doe Nurses #1-4, Betty J Williams (Filing fee $ 402) filed by Hinton Kelvin. (Attachments: #1 MEMO, #2 Envelope, #3 Exhibit)(ShannonHolden, 4) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
