Carlile v. SoClean, Inc.
Jerry Carlile |
SoClean, Inc. |
4:2021cv03562 |
October 28, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Lee H Rosenthal |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER granting #11 Agreed MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer, Move, or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Class Action Complaint ; Answer due for SoClean, Inc. 21 days after decision is issued on Motion to Transfer and Coordination or Consolidation pending in MDL No. 3021. (Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(gclair, 4) |
Filing 11 Agreed MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer, Move, or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Class Action Complaint by SoClean, Inc., filed. Motion Docket Date 12/9/2021. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Durell, Daniel) |
Filing 10 ORDER granting #7 Motion for Brett Votava to Appear Pro Hac Vice.(Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(gclair, 4) |
Filing 9 ORDER granting #6 Motion for Andrew Nantz to Appear Pro Hac Vice.(Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(gclair, 4) |
Filing 8 ORDER granting #5 Motion for Todd M Johnson to Appear Pro Hac Vice. (Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(gclair, 4) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Brett Votava to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Jerry Carlile, filed. Motion Docket Date 11/29/2021. (RachelSalazar, 4) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Andrew Nantz to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Jerry Carlile, filed. Motion Docket Date 11/29/2021. (RachelSalazar, 4) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Todd M. Johnson to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Jerry Carlile, filed. Motion Docket Date 11/29/2021. (RachelSalazar, 4) |
Filing 4 ORDER Scheduling Rule 16 Conference With the Court and Setting Out the Requirements for Initial Pretrial Work. Initial Conference set for 1/28/2022 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 11B before Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal. (Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) (Attachments: #1 Attachments) Parties notified.(ShannonHoldenadi, 4) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to SoClean, Inc.. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(RachelSalazar, 4) |
Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to All Defendants, filed.(Voyles, Adam) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0541-27267060) filed by Jerry Carlile. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Voyles, Adam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Carlile v. SoClean, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Jerry Carlile | |
Represented By: | Adam Q Voyles |
Represented By: | Andrew Nantz |
Represented By: | Brett Votava |
Represented By: | Todd M. Johnson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: SoClean, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Daniel Glenn Durell |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.