Ruiz et al v. Wood Group USA, Inc.
| Heron Ruiz and Rozalda Ruiz |
| Wood Group USA Inc |
| 4:2021cv03720 |
| November 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Alfred H Bennett |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. § 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 27
ORDER granting #25 Motion for Bryan Edward Bowdler to Appear Pro Hac Vice. (Signed by Judge Alfred H Bennett) Parties notified.(gclair, 4)
|
| Filing 26 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Wood Group USA Inc, filed.(Bowdler, Bryan) |
| Filing 25 MOTION for Bryan Edward Bowdler to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Wood Group USA Inc, filed. Motion Docket Date 1/3/2022. (Bowdler, Bryan) |
| Filing 24 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Heron Ruiz, Rozalda Ruiz, filed.(Foty, Donny) |
|
Filing 23
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 2/11/2022 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 8C before Judge Alfred H Bennett(Judge Alfred H Bennett) Parties notified.(BrendaLacy, 4)
|
| Filing 22 Case transferred in from Colorado. Case Number 1:21-cv-01977; certified copy of transfer order, certified docket sheet, and transfer letter received |
|
Filing 21
ORDER by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 11/9/2021, re: #20 Plaintiffs' Joint Motion to Change Venue to the Southern District of Texas is GRANTED; #7 Defendants Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as moot. ORDERED that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1404(a), this action shall be transferredto the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas..(sphil, )
|
| Filing 20 Joint MOTION to Change Venue to the Southern District of Texas by Plaintiffs Heron Ruiz, Rozalda Ruiz. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Foty, Don) |
|
Filing 19
ORDER by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 10/01/2021 re: #18 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply is GRANTED. As the Court has already reminded the parties, pursuant to I.G.2 of this Court's Practice Standards, "[a]ny motion for extension of time shall be filed no later than three business days before the date the motion, response, reply, or other paper is due." The deadline for plaintiffs' response to defendant's motion to dismiss and for plaintiffs to file a first amended complaint is on or before October 15, 2021. Text Only Entry(pabsec)
|
| Filing 18 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #7 MOTION to Dismiss and Amended Complaint by Plaintiffs Heron Ruiz, Rozalda Ruiz. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Foty, Don) |
|
Filing 17
SCHEDULING ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 30 September 2021. (cmadr, )
|
| Filing 16 COURTROOM MINUTES for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty: Scheduling Conference held on 9/30/2021. FTR: A501. (cthom, ) |
| Filing 15 Proposed Scheduling Order by Plaintiffs Heron Ruiz, Rozalda Ruiz. (Foty, Don) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 9/20/2021 #9 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply is GRANTED. For future requests for extension of time, the parties are reminded that, pursuant to I.G.2 of this Court's Practice Standards, "[a]ny motion for extension of time shall be filed no later than three business days before the date the motion, response, reply, or other paper is due." Text Only Entry(pabsec)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty for non-dispositive matters. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, and (4) conduct a pretrial conference and enter a pretrial order. Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the magistrate judge or on the request of the parties by motion, this court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding, by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 9/20/2021. Text Only Entry (pabsec)
|
| Filing 12 CASE REASSIGNED pursuant to #11 . All parties do not consent. This case is randomly reassigned to Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer. All future pleadings should be designated as 21-cv-01977-PAB. (Text Only Entry) (cmadr, ) |
|
Filing 11
Minute ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 20 September 2021. Pursuant to the consent form filed by the parties declining consent under the D.C.Colo.LCivR 40.1(c) (ECF #10 ), the Court directs the Clerk of the Court to reassign this case under D.C.Colo.LCivR 40.1(a). This Court may continue on the case to hear matters referred by the district judge under 28 U.S.C. 636(b), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 and D.C.Colo.LCivR 72.1(c). (cmadr, )
|
| Filing 10 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Plaintiffs Heron Ruiz, Rozalda Ruiz All parties do not consent.. (Foty, Don) |
| Filing 9 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #7 MOTION to Dismiss , MOTION for Extension of Time to file First Amended Complaint by Plaintiffs Heron Ruiz, Rozalda Ruiz. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Foty, Don) |
|
Filing 8
Minute ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 30 August 2021. Due to a conflict on the Court's calendar, the Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) Scheduling Conference set for September 23, 2021 is vacated and rescheduled for September 30, 2021, at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom A-501, on the fifth floor of the Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse located at 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado. The parties shall complete and file the Magistrate Judge Consent Form (ECF 3-1) on or before September 17, 2021. (cmadr, )
|
| Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss by Defendant Wood Group USA, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Garza v. Wood Group USA Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Order re Conditional Certification, #3 Exhibit C - Order re Notice, #4 Exhibit D - Declaration of J. Jones, #5 Exhibit E - Declaration of E. Patten)(Bowdler, Bryan) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Heron Ruiz, Rozalda Ruiz. Wood Group USA, Inc. served on 7/23/2021, answer due 8/27/2021. (Foty, Don) |
| Filing 5 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Answer or Respond to the Complaint by Defendant Wood Group USA, Inc.. Wood Group USA, Inc. answer due 8/27/2021. (Bowdler, Bryan) |
|
Filing 4
Minute ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 22 July 2021. Consent Form due by 9/10/2021. Proposed Scheduling Order due 9/16/2021. Scheduling Conference set for 9/23/2021 11:30 AM in Courtroom A 501 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. (cmadr, )
|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (jtorr, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Text Only Entry. (jtorr, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Wood Group USA, Inc. (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number 1082-7970350)Attorney Don J. Foty added to party Heron Ruiz(pty:pla), Attorney Don J. Foty added to party Rozalda Ruiz(pty:pla), filed by Heron Ruiz, Rozalda Ruiz. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons)(Foty, Don) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
