Scarbrough et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
Edward Lee Scarbrough and Cheryl B. Slaid-Scarbrough |
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., American Federated Mortgage Corporation and McCarthy & Holthus, LLP |
4:2021cv03760 |
November 17, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Charles Eskridge |
Real Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Edward Lee Scarbrough, Cheryl B. Slaid-Scarbrough, filed.(Sullivan, John) |
|
Filing 17 REPLY to Response to #8 MOTION to Remand, filed by Edward Lee Scarbrough, Cheryl B. Slaid-Scarbrough. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - LinkedIn Page, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B - Firm Bio)(Sullivan, John) |
Filing 16 MOTION to Dismiss #13 Amended Complaint/Counterclaim/Crossclaim etc., and Brief in Support by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., filed. Motion Docket Date 2/1/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Yow, Rebecca) |
Filing 15 RESPONSE to #8 MOTION to Remand , filed by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Yow, Rebecca) |
***Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings: Initial Conference reset for 1/13/2022 at 09:15 AM in by video before Magistrate Judge Sam S Sheldon (sjones, 4) |
Filing 14 JOINT DISCOVERY/CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., filed.(Yow, Rebecca) |
Filing 13 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against American Federated Mortgage Corporation, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., McCarthy & Holthus, LLP filed by Edward Lee Scarbrough, Cheryl B. Slaid-Scarbrough. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex A Notice of Substitute Trustee Sale, #2 Exhibit Ex B Temporary Restraining Order)(Sullivan, John) |
|
Filing 11 NOTICE of Defendant McCarthy & Holthus, LLP's Consent to Removal by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., filed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Yow, Rebecca) |
Filing 10 STATEMENT of Information in Removed Action by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., filed.(Yow, Rebecca) |
Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for R. Kendall Yow to Appear as Attorney by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., filed. Motion Docket Date 1/6/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order granting Chase's Unopposed Motion for R. Kendall Yow to Appear on Behalf of Attorney-in-Charge at January 13, 2022 Initial Pretrial Conference)(Yow, Rebecca) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Remand by Edward Lee Scarbrough, Cheryl B. Slaid-Scarbrough, filed. Motion Docket Date 1/6/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - AFMC search, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B - Notice (first), #3 Exhibit Exhibit C - TRO (State court), #4 Exhibit Exhibit D - Dismissal Order, #5 Exhibit Exhibit E - Notice (second), #6 Exhibit Exhibit F - Petition)(Sullivan, John) |
Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE IN A REMOVED ACTION by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., filed.(Yow, Rebecca) |
|
|
|
Filing 3 MOTION to Dismiss and Brief in Support by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., filed. Motion Docket Date 12/28/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Proposed Order granting Motion to Dismiss)(Yow, Rebecca) |
Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. identifying JPMorgan Chase & Co. as Corporate Parent, filed.(Yow, Rebecca) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 434th Judicial District Court of Fort Bend County, Texas, case number 21-DCV-288585 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0541-27354107) filed by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Lewis, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.