Graham v. City of Houston, Texas
Plaintiff: James T Graham
Defendant: City of Houston, Texas
Case Number: 4:2021cv03845
Filed: November 23, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: George C Hanks
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 451
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 9, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Carolyn L. Martin on behalf of City of Houston, Texas, filed. (Martin, Carolyn)
November 30, 2021 Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by City of Houston, Texas, filed.(Cohen, Marjorie)
November 30, 2021 The above entitled action is assigned to United States District Judge George C. Hanks, Jr. Attorneys and Pro Se individuals are responsible for complying with this Court's rules and procedures, specifically, under Rule 6. Motion Practice. B. Pre-Motion Conferences Required for Particular Motions. Please download and review the individual practices of the assigned District Judge, located at: https://www.txs.uscourts.gov/sites/txs/files/GCH_Court_Procedures_09.2021.pdf. (Note: If clicking the link does not work, you can copy/paste the url into your web browser address bar to view the procedures.) (bthomas, 4)
November 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER.(Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(bthomas, 4)
November 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER on Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action.(Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(bthomas, 4)
November 24, 2021 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by James T Graham, filed.(Costea, Peter)
November 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 5/18/2022 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 600 in Houston before Magistrate Judge Andrew M Edison. (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(RachelSalazaradi, 4)
November 23, 2021 Filing 2 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by James T Graham, filed.(Costea, Peter)
November 23, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 133rd Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas, case number 2021-62172 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0541-27383215) filed by City of Houston, Texas. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A. Index of Documents, #2 Exhibit B-1 Harris County Docket Sheet, #3 Exhibit B-2 Plaintiff's Original Petition, #4 Exhibit B-2.1, #5 Exhibit B-2.2, #6 Exhibit B-3 Plaintiff's 1st Amended Petition, #7 Exhibit B-4 Plaintiff's 2d Amended Petition, #8 Exhibit B-4.1, #9 Exhibit B-4.2, #10 Exhibit B-5 Return of Service, #11 Exhibit B-6 Defendant's Answer, #12 Exhibit C. List of Counsel)(Cohen, Marjorie)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Graham v. City of Houston, Texas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James T Graham
Represented By: Peter Costea
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Houston, Texas
Represented By: Marjorie Leigh Cohen
Represented By: Carolyn Lilian Martin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?