Graham v. City of Houston, Texas
James T Graham |
City of Houston, Texas |
4:2021cv03845 |
November 23, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
George C Hanks |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 451 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Carolyn L. Martin on behalf of City of Houston, Texas, filed. (Martin, Carolyn) |
Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by City of Houston, Texas, filed.(Cohen, Marjorie) |
The above entitled action is assigned to United States District Judge George C. Hanks, Jr. Attorneys and Pro Se individuals are responsible for complying with this Court's rules and procedures, specifically, under Rule 6. Motion Practice. B. Pre-Motion Conferences Required for Particular Motions. Please download and review the individual practices of the assigned District Judge, located at: https://www.txs.uscourts.gov/sites/txs/files/GCH_Court_Procedures_09.2021.pdf. (Note: If clicking the link does not work, you can copy/paste the url into your web browser address bar to view the procedures.) (bthomas, 4) |
Filing 6 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER.(Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(bthomas, 4) |
Filing 5 ORDER on Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action.(Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(bthomas, 4) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by James T Graham, filed.(Costea, Peter) |
Filing 3 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 5/18/2022 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 600 in Houston before Magistrate Judge Andrew M Edison. (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(RachelSalazaradi, 4) |
Filing 2 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by James T Graham, filed.(Costea, Peter) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 133rd Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas, case number 2021-62172 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0541-27383215) filed by City of Houston, Texas. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A. Index of Documents, #2 Exhibit B-1 Harris County Docket Sheet, #3 Exhibit B-2 Plaintiff's Original Petition, #4 Exhibit B-2.1, #5 Exhibit B-2.2, #6 Exhibit B-3 Plaintiff's 1st Amended Petition, #7 Exhibit B-4 Plaintiff's 2d Amended Petition, #8 Exhibit B-4.1, #9 Exhibit B-4.2, #10 Exhibit B-5 Return of Service, #11 Exhibit B-6 Defendant's Answer, #12 Exhibit C. List of Counsel)(Cohen, Marjorie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Graham v. City of Houston, Texas | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: James T Graham | |
Represented By: | Peter Costea |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: City of Houston, Texas | |
Represented By: | Marjorie Leigh Cohen |
Represented By: | Carolyn Lilian Martin |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.