Thomas v. Richmond Weslayan, Ltd
Wayne Thomas |
Richmond Weslayan, Ltd |
4:2021cv03932 |
December 2, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Alfred H Bennett |
Yvonne Y Ho |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 ORDER OF DISMISSAL.Case terminated on 10/18/22 (Signed by Judge Alfred H Bennett) Parties notified.(ledwards, 4) |
Filing 21 STIPULATION of Dismissal With Prejudice by Wayne Thomas, filed.(Ku, Brian) |
Filing 20 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Yvonne Y Ho. (Signed by Judge Alfred H Bennett) Parties notified. (ltien, 4) |
Filing 19 SCHEDULING ORDER. Amended Pleadings due by 6/15/2022. Pltf Expert Report due by 11/1/2022. Deft Expert Report due by 12/1/2022. Discovery due by 5/1/2023. Motion Filing due by 6/15/2023. Defendant shall supply Plaintiff with a final version of its pretrial order by 9/8/2023. Plaintiff is responsible for filing Joint Pretrial Order by 9/22/2023. Docket Call set for 10/6/2023 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 8C before Judge Alfred H Bennett Jury Trial set for 10/10/2023 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 8C before Judge Alfred H Bennett(Signed by Judge Alfred H Bennett) Parties notified.(olindor, 4) |
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Alfred H Bennett. SCHEDULING CONFERENCE held on 5/13/2022. Potential settlement, dates agreed, scheduling order to follow. Appearances: Andrew P McCormick, John K Grubb.(Court Reporter: K. Miller), filed.(ledwards, 4) |
Filing 18 JOINT DISCOVERY/CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN by Wayne Thomas, filed. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Scheduling Order)(Ku, Brian) |
Filing 17 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Richmond Weslayan, Ltd, filed.(Munoz, Laurie Ann) |
Filing 16 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Richmond Weslayan, Ltd, filed.(McCormick, Andrew) |
Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew P. McCormick on behalf of Richmond Weslayan, Ltd, filed. (McCormick, Andrew) |
Filing 14 ORDER granting #13 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time To answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint. Answer due by 3/31/2022.(Signed by Judge Alfred H Bennett) Parties notified.(ledwards, 4) |
Filing 13 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time To answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint by Richmond Weslayan, Ltd, filed. Motion Docket Date 4/6/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Munoz, Laurie Ann) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Resetting. Parties notified. Initial Conference set for 5/13/2022 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 8C before Judge Alfred H Bennett, filed. (ledwards, 4) |
Filing 11 ORDER granting #10 Motion for Continuance; Motion-related deadline set re: #10 MOTION for Continuance of Rule 16 Initial Pretrial Conference. Initial Conference set for 4/29/2022 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 8C before Judge Alfred H Bennett.(Signed by Judge Alfred H Bennett) Parties notified.(ledwards, 4) |
Filing 10 MOTION for Continuance of Rule 16 Initial Pretrial Conference by Wayne Thomas, filed. Motion Docket Date 3/30/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Ku, Brian) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Default Judgment against Richmond Weslayan, Ltd by Wayne Thomas, filed. Motion Docket Date 3/30/2022. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Plaintiff, #2 Affidavit of Brian T. Ku, #3 Proposed Order Default Judgment)(Ku, Brian) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Brian Ku on behalf of Wayne Thomas, filed. (Ku, Brian) |
Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Wayne Thomas, filed.(Mussman, Louis) |
Filing 6 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to Richmond Weslayan, Ltd served on 12/10/2021, answer due 1/3/2022, filed.(Mussman, Louis) |
Filing 5 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 3/11/2022 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 8C before Judge Alfred H Bennett. (Signed by Judge Alfred H Bennett) Parties notified.(BrandisIsom, 4) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Richmond Weslayan, Ltd. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(JacquelineMata, 4) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by John K. Grubb on behalf of Wayne Thomas, filed. (Grubb, John) |
Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Richmond Weslayan, Ltd, filed.(Mussman, Louis) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Richmond Weslayan, Ltd (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0541-27420391) filed by Wayne Thomas. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Mussman, Louis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Thomas v. Richmond Weslayan, Ltd | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Wayne Thomas | |
Represented By: | John K Grubb |
Represented By: | Louis I Mussman |
Represented By: | Brian Tse-Hua Ku |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Richmond Weslayan, Ltd | |
Represented By: | Andrew P McCormick |
Represented By: | Laurie Ann Landry Munoz |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.