Lewis v. Harris County et al
| William Soloman Lewis and William Solomon Lewis |
| Harris County and Ed Gonzalez |
| 4:2021cv03980 |
| December 6, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Charles Eskridge |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ***Delivery Confirmation for delivery date(s) 12/27/2021 re: Document(s) Sent, filed. (dhansen, 4) |
Filing 5
ORDER OF STATUS TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS granting #2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. The application by Plaintiff William Solomon Lewis to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. Dkt 2.(Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) Parties notified.(jengonzalez, 4)
|
| Filing 6 CONSENT to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge by William Solomon Lewis, filed.(rkonieczny, 4) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (BrandisIsom, 4) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by William Soloman Lewis, filed. (BrandisIsom, 4) |
| Filing 2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by William Soloman Lewis, filed. Motion Docket Date 12/27/2021. (BrandisIsom, 4) |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against Ed Gonzalez, Harris County (Filing fee $ 402) filed by William Soloman Lewis.(BrandisIsom, 4) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
