Chenier v. Center for Disease Control and Prevention et al
Tiki Chenier |
Center for Disease Control and Prevention, US Department of Health and Human Services and US Executive Branch, President |
4:2021cv04173 |
December 23, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
David Hittner |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, for a More Definite Statement by Center for Disease Control and Prevention, US Department of Health and Human Services, US Executive Branch, President, filed. Motion Docket Date 3/11/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Rodriguez, Jimmy) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Tiki Chenier, filed.(RachelSalazar, 4) |
Filing 2 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 3/3/2022 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 703 before Magistrate Judge Peter Bray(Signed by Judge David Hittner) Parties notified.(ckrus, 4) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Tiki Chenier.(ckrus, 4) |
Summons Issued as to Center for Disease Control and Prevention, US Department of Health and Human Services, US Executive Branch, President, Issued summons returned to plaintiff in person, filed.(ckrus, 4) |
Filing fee: $402 re: #1 Complaint, receipt number HOU106314, filed. (ckrus, 4) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.