Littlejohn v. Montgomery County Courthouse Bayliff #1 et al
| Daytwon Littlejohn |
| Montgomery County Courthouse Bayliff #1, Montgomery County Courthouse Bayliff #2, Montgomery County Courthouse Bayliff #3, Montgomery County Courthouse Bayliff #4 and Montgomery County Courthouse Bayliff #5 |
| 4:2021cv04212 |
| December 28, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| George C Hanks |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(bthomas, 4)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (BrandisIsom, 4) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Change of Address by Daytwon Littlejohn, filed. (BrandisIsom, 4) |
| Filing 5 Letter from Daytwon Littlejohn re: Mistreatment, filed. (BrandisIsom, 4) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Daytwon Littlejohn, filed. (BrandisIsom, 4) |
| Filing 2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Daytwon Littlejohn, filed. Motion Docket Date 1/18/2022. (BrandisIsom, 4) |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402) filed by Daytwon Littlejohn. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Grievance Form, #3 Envelope)(BrandisIsom, 4) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
