Johnson v. Harris County Jail et al
| William Johnson |
| Harris County Jail and Harris County |
| 4:2022cv00032 |
| January 3, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Kenneth M Hoyt |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. The jail is not a jural entity capable of being sued. The Complaint, (Doc. # 1), is DISMISSED under 42 U.S.C. 1915A. Case terminated on February 28, 2022. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M Hoyt) Parties notified.(chorace)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M Hoyt) Parties notified.(ShoshanaArnow, 4)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (dgonzalez, 5) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by William Johnson, filed. (dgonzalez, 5) |
| Filing 2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by William Johnson, filed. Motion Docket Date 1/26/2022. (dgonzalez, 5) Modified on 1/5/2022 (bgoolsby, 4). |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against Harris County, Harris County Jail (Filing fee $ 402) filed by William Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits)(dgonzalez, 5) Modified on 1/5/2022 (bgoolsby, 4). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
