Pearl IP Licensing LLC v. MSA Safety Incorporated
Pearl IP Licensing LLC |
MSA Safety Incorporated |
4:2022cv00294 |
January 28, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Keith P Ellison |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ANSWER to #11 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim by Pearl IP Licensing LLC, filed.(Wernow, Howard) |
Filing 13 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by MSA Safety Incorporated, filed.(McNabnay, Neil) |
Filing 12 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by MSA Safety Incorporated, filed.(McNabnay, Neil) |
Filing 11 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand, COUNTERCLAIM against Pearl IP Licensing LLC by MSA Safety Incorporated, filed.(McNabnay, Neil) |
Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Pearl IP Licensing LLC, filed.(Wernow, Howard) |
Filing 9 ORDER granting #4 Motion for Howard Wernow to Appear Pro Hac Vice.(Signed by Judge Keith P Ellison) Parties notified.(arrivera, 4) |
Filing 8 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 4/15/2022 at 03:45 PM in Courtroom 3A Houston before Judge Keith P Ellison. (Signed by Judge Keith P Ellison) Parties notified.(ShannonHoldenadi, 4) |
Filing 7 US Patent and Trademark Office Notified. AO 120, filed. (Attachments: #1 Complaint) (ShannonHoldenadi, 4) |
Filing 6 ***FILED IN ERROR ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 5/6/2022 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 9B before Judge Sim Lake. (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified.(ShannonHoldenadi, 4) Modified on 2/1/2022 (ShannonHolden, 4). |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to MSA Safety Incorporated. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(RachelSalazar, 4) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Howard L. Wernow to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Pearl IP Licensing LLC, filed. Motion Docket Date 2/18/2022. (Wernow, Howard) |
Filing 3 Request for Issuance of Summons as to MSA Safety Incorporated, filed.(Chaudhari, Papool) |
Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Pearl IP Licensing LLC, filed.(Chaudhari, Papool) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MSA Safety Incorporated (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0541-27676423) filed by Pearl IP Licensing LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B)(Chaudhari, Papool) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Pearl IP Licensing LLC v. MSA Safety Incorporated | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Pearl IP Licensing LLC | |
Represented By: | Howard L Wernow |
Represented By: | Papool S Chaudhari |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: MSA Safety Incorporated | |
Represented By: | Neil J McNabnay |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.