Pearson v. GC Services, LP
| Tracy Pearson, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated and Tracy Pearson |
| GC Services, LP |
| 4:2022cv00333 |
| February 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Charles Eskridge |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and to Dismiss Under Rule 12(b)(3) by GC Services, LP, filed. Motion Docket Date 4/20/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Mason, Jessica) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Filing Consent Forms to Join Lawsuit Pursuant to 29 USC 216(b) by Tracy Pearson, filed. (Attachments: #1 Consent Forms)(Foty, Donny) |
| Filing 13 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by GC Services, LP, filed.(Mason, Jessica) |
| Filing 12 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Tracy Pearson, filed.(Foty, Donny) |
Filing 11
ORDER re: #8 Stipulation. Response due by 03/30/2022.(Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) Parties notified.(jengonzalez, 4)
|
|
Filing 10
SCHEDULING and DOCKET CONTROL ORDER. Amended Pleadings due by 07/26/2022. Joinder of Parties due by 06/24/2022. Plaintiff Expert Report due by 01/24/2023. Deft Expert Report due by 02/23/2023. Discovery due by 04/11/2023. Mediation due by 06/27/2023. Dispositive Motion Filing due by 05/11/2023. Non-Dispositive Motion Filing due by 05/11/2023. Joint Pretrial Order due by 07/27/2023. Docket Call set for 09/19/2023 at 1:30 PM before Judge Charles Eskridge. (Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) Parties notified. (jennellegonzalez) (Entered: 02/28/2022)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 5/25/2022 at 10:30 AM by video before Magistrate Judge Christina A Bryan(Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) Parties notified.(jengonzalez, 4)
|
| Initial Conference set for 5/12/2022 at 09:30 AM in by video before Magistrate Judge Sam S Sheldon is CANCELLED. (jengonzalez, 4) |
| Filing 8 STIPULATION re: Joint Stipulation to Extend Time for Defendant to File Responsive Pleading to Plaintiff's Original Complaint by GC Services, LP, filed.(Mason, Jessica) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #4 MOTION for Matthew S. Grimsley to Appear Pro Hac Vice. (Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) Parties notified.(jengonzalez, 4)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 5/12/2022 at 09:30 AM in by video before Magistrate Judge Sam S Sheldon(Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) Parties notified.(jengonzalez, 4)
|
| Filing 5 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to GC Services, LP served on 2/7/2022, answer due 2/28/2022, filed.(Foty, Donny) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Matthew S. Grimsley to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Tracy Pearson, filed. Motion Docket Date 3/4/2022. (Grimsley, Matthew) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to GC Services, LP. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(hlerma, 4) |
| Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to GC Services, LP, filed.(Foty, Donny) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against GC Services, LP (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0541-27688166) filed by Tracy Pearson, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Foty, Donny) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
