Barker v. ITL Foods, LP
| Adam Barker |
| ITL Foods, LP doing business as Pizza Hut |
| 4:2022cv00342 |
| February 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Peter Bray |
| Lynn N Hughes |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
ORDER FOR DISCLOSURE. Parties to comply by 4/15/2022. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter Bray) Parties notified.(jmarchand, 4)
|
|
Filing 17
PROTECTIVE ORDER (Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter Bray) Parties notified.(jmarchand, 4)
|
|
Filing 16
SCHEDULING ORDER. Class Certification Discovery due by 7/15/2022. Class Certification Motion Filing due by 8/1/2022. Responses due by 8/30/2022. Reply due 9/7/2022. Status Conference set for 10/7/2022 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 703 before Magistrate Judge Peter Bray(Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter Bray) Parties notified.(jmarchand, 4)
|
| Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Peter Bray. SCHEDULING CONFERENCE held on 3/31/2022. Scheduling order, disclosure order, and protective order to be entered. Appearances: C Ryan Morgan, Jolie N. Pavlos, Richard J Burch, Laura Flores Macom.(ERO:Yes), filed.(jmarchand, 4) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Richard J. (Rex) Burch on behalf of Adam Barker, filed. (Burch, Richard) |
| Filing 14 JOINT DISCOVERY/CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN by Adam Barker, filed.(MORGAN, CHARLES) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 3/31/2022 at 10:00 AM in by video before Magistrate Judge Peter Bray(Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter Bray) Parties notified.(jmarchand, 4)
|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Laura F. Macom on behalf of ITL Foods, LP, filed. (Macom, Laura) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by ITL Foods, LP, filed.(Wallis, Michael) |
| Filing 10 General Reference to Magistrate Judge Peter Bray. (Signed by Judge Lynn N Hughes) Parties notified. The initial conference set for 5/2/2022 before Judge Lynn N. Hughes is cancelled. (ghassan, 4) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #6 Motion for Jolie N. Pavlos to Appear Pro Hac Vice. (Signed by Judge Lynn N Hughes) Parties notified. (ghassan, 4)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #5 Motion for C. Ryan Morgan to Appear Pro Hac Vice. (Signed by Judge Lynn N Hughes) Parties notified. (ghassan, 4)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER FOR CONFERENCE. Initial Conference set for 5/2/2022 at 10:30 AM in Room 11122 before Judge Lynn N Hughes (Signed by Judge Lynn N Hughes) Parties notified.(BrandisIsom, 4)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Jolie N. Pavlos to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Adam Barker, filed. Motion Docket Date 2/24/2022. (Dunlap, Andrew) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for C. Ryan Morgan to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Adam Barker, filed. Motion Docket Date 2/24/2022. (Dunlap, Andrew) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to ITL Foods, LP d/b/a Pizza Hut. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(hlerma, 4) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Filing Notice of Consent to Join by Adam Barker, filed. (Dunlap, Andrew) |
| Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to ITL Foods, LP d/b/a Pizza Hut, filed.(Dunlap, Andrew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ITL Foods, LP d/b/a Pizza Hut (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0541-27693517) filed by Adam Barker. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Consent, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Dunlap, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
