Dixon v. Schneider Transport, Inc.
| Erik Dixon |
| Schneider Transport, Inc. and Schneider Transport, Inc. doing business as Schneider Enterprise Resources, LLC |
| 4:2022cv00471 |
| February 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Ewing Werlein |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Erik Dixon, filed.(Murphy, Marjorie) |
Filing 4
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 6/10/2022 at 02:15 PM in Room 11521 before Judge Ewing Werlein, Jr. (Signed by Judge Ewing Werlein, Jr) Parties notified.(jdav, 4)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Meghaan C. Madriz on behalf of Schneider Transport, Inc., filed. (Madriz, Meghaan) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Schneider Transport, Inc., filed.(Madriz, Meghaan) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Harris County District Court No. 127, case number 2022-0748 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXSDC-27741754) filed by Schneider Transport, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Madriz, Meghaan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
