Legall-Johnson et al v. JPMorgan Chase & Co. et al
Michelle Legall-Johnson and William Johnson |
JPMorgan Chase & Co., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and JOHN DOE |
4:2022cv00489 |
February 15, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Sim Lake |
Real Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 6/3/2022 at 03:00 PM in Courtroom 9B before Judge Sim Lake.(Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified.(sanderson, 4) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Nonsuit by Michelle Legall-Johnson, filed. (JacquelineMata, 4) |
Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by JPMorgan Chase & Co., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. identifying JPMorgan Chase & Co. and The Vanguard Group as Corporate Parent, filed.(Hytken, Rachel) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 269th District Court, case number 2022-04953 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXSDC-27752331) filed by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., JPMorgan Chase & Co.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit A-1, #3 Exhibit A-2, #4 Exhibit A-3, #5 Exhibit A-4, #6 Exhibit A-5, #7 Exhibit A-6, #8 Exhibit A-7, #9 Exhibit A-8, #10 Exhibit A-9, #11 Exhibit A-10, #12 Exhibit B, #13 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Lewis, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.