Dixon v. Jaddou et al
| Sallyanne Dixon |
| Ur M. JADDOU and Kirt Thompson |
| 4:2022cv00557 |
| February 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Keith P Ellison |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 MOTION to Dismiss #1 Complaint,, by Ur M. Jaddou, filed. Motion Docket Date 5/10/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Proposed Order)(Robinson-Gaither, Eleanor) |
Filing 2
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 5/13/2022 at 03:15 PM in Courtroom 3A Houston before Judge Keith P Ellison. (Signed by Judge Keith P Ellison) Parties notified.(RachelWillborg, 4)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ur M. JADDOU, Kirt Thompson (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXSDC-27775880) filed by Sallyanne Dixon. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Plaintiff's I-485 Receipt Notice, #2 Exhibit I-485 Approval Notice for Plaintiff's Spouse, #3 Exhibit I-131 and I-765 Receipt Notices and I-765 Approval, #4 Exhibit Plaintiff's Current I-94, #5 Exhibit Medical Records for Plaintiff's Mother, #6 Civil Cover Sheet, #7 Unredacted attachment, #8 Unredacted attachment)(Loughran, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
